From: Cezary Kaliszyk <ck189400@zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Objects poor performance
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:38:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021119183857.GB15185@zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 544 bytes --]
I tried to implement a simple double-linked list with constant time insertion
and removal. I tried just iterating over such a list with both object and
structure implementation. And these are the effects:
Time:
Structures: 2.503s
Objects: 27.027s
The implementations are the same so why are objects that slow? I include
the tests if someone wishes to test oneself or see if anything can be
done faster.
PS. The size of stripped executable is also 2*larger with objects.
But that's not such a big problem.
--
[-- Attachment #1.2: object.ml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 940 bytes --]
class ['a] lst data =
object
val mutable data = (data : 'a)
val mutable prev = ((Obj.magic ()) : 'a lst)
val mutable next = ((Obj.magic ()) : 'a lst)
method add new_data =
new lst new_data in
new_elem#set_next next;
new_elem#set_prev (next#get_prev);
next#set_prev new_elem;
next <- new_elem
method get_prev = prev
method get_next = next
method set_prev elem = prev <- elem
method set_next elem = next <- elem
method get = data
end
;;
let l = new lst (0, 0);;
l#set_next l;;
l#set_prev l;;
let rec adder cnt =
l#add (cnt, 0);
if cnt > 0 then adder (cnt - 1)
in adder 1000;;
let rec iterator a cnt alst =
if cnt = 0 then a else
let (i, _) = alst#get in
iterator (a + i) (cnt - 1) alst#get_next
;;
let rec test cnt =
ignore (iterator 0 1000 l);
if cnt = 0 then () else test (cnt - 1)
;;
test 1000000;;
[-- Attachment #1.3: struct.ml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 826 bytes --]
type 'a ts = {
mutable data : 'a;
mutable prev : 'a ts;
mutable next : 'a ts;
};;
let rec single elem =
let ret = {
data = elem;
next = Obj.magic 0;
prev = Obj.magic 0;
} in
ret.next <- ret;
ret.prev <- ret;
ret
;;
let rec add elem ({next = n} as lst) =
let newnext = {
data = elem;
prev = lst;
next = n
} in
n.prev <- newnext;
lst.next <- newnext
;;
let l = single (0, 0);;
let rec adder cnt =
add (cnt, 0) l;
if cnt > 0 then adder (cnt - 1)
in adder 1000;;
let rec iterator a cnt alst =
if cnt = 0 then a else
let (i, _) = alst.data in
iterator (a + i) (cnt - 1) alst.next
;;
let rec test cnt =
ignore (iterator 0 1000 l);
if cnt = 0 then () else test (cnt - 1)
;;
test 1000000;;
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-19 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-19 18:38 Cezary Kaliszyk [this message]
2002-11-20 11:50 ` Michal Moskal
2002-11-25 10:33 ` Xavier Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021119183857.GB15185@zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl \
--to=ck189400@zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox