From: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
To: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:21:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021007072153.GA1326@iliana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021006205517.B19829@verdot.inria.fr>
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 08:55:26PM +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am very sorry to announce here that the attitude of the direction of
> the caml team is seriously comprimizing the future of Camlp4. I would
> like you to send messages to stop that. Thank you if you can help.
Daniel, the one problem i have with separating camlp4 from ocaml, is
that, if i remember well, the standalone camlp4 needed access to the
ocaml sources to build. As a debian maintainer of ocaml package if find
this to be very messy, and was hapy when it was solved by including
camlp4 in ocaml.
If we separate again, what will be the situation on this same topic ?
will you again depend on the ocaml source ? Is there not a cleaner
solution for this ?
And also i am curious, what is so difficult with continuing to release
camlp4 as part of ocaml, but have a separate CVS tree for developpment,
that you sync with ocaml from time to time (and probably before each new
release), in the same way as DRI for example maintains a separate
development tree from XFree86 ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-07 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-06 18:55 Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:23 ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-06 19:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:01 ` brogoff
2002-10-06 21:09 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:29 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 20:01 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:24 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-06 20:24 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
[not found] ` <200210062143.g96Lhix15834@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
2002-10-07 2:47 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:28 ` Dave Mason
2002-10-06 20:50 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:45 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 21:03 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:46 ` Florian Douetteau
2002-10-07 2:56 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 23:54 ` Markus Mottl
2002-10-07 9:06 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 11:34 ` Kontra, Gergely
2002-10-11 12:56 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-11 13:15 ` [Caml-list] Future " Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-12 21:45 ` Oleg
2002-10-13 9:02 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 16:36 ` [Caml-list] Syntax brogoff
2002-10-07 7:21 ` Sven LUTHER [this message]
2002-10-07 8:52 ` [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4 Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:25 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07 11:30 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:55 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-08 7:57 ` Alessandro Baretta
[not found] ` <nhalm59cf0s.fsf@malabar.mitre.org>
2002-10-08 14:05 ` Alessandro Baretta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021007072153.GA1326@iliana \
--to=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox