From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA25410; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:24:38 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA25081 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:24:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g96KOa526147 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:24:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA20178 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:24:36 +0200 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:24:36 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4 Message-ID: <20021006222436.D20005@verdot.inria.fr> References: <20021006205517.B19829@verdot.inria.fr> <200210061929.PAA01123@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <20021006220127.B20005@verdot.inria.fr> <3DA09BE8.3020102@baretta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3DA09BE8.3020102@baretta.com>; from alex@baretta.com on Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:24:08PM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:24:08PM +0200, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > Why in the world do you guys take such strong stands in your > respective positions? I am no one to give you advice, but, > really, take it easy... I insist because I consider that as important, what the direction does not. And be sure that I shall not quit that fight. If OCaml wants to succeed in the industry, some reflexions must not be tolerated: the direction of OCaml refuses to understand that elementary point and prefer think that the problem is me. > As an aside, what is the purpose of developing Caml Light, > anyway. Should it not simply be superseded by O'Caml? It is not developped any more, but there are still users. Therefore, the bugs are fixed. If I quit developping Camlp4, there will be no more developpments on it, and it will be like Caml Light: you will be able to use it, but for the improvements, it is terminated. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners