From: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:24:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021006222436.D20005@verdot.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DA09BE8.3020102@baretta.com>; from alex@baretta.com on Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:24:08PM +0200
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:24:08PM +0200, Alessandro Baretta wrote:
> Why in the world do you guys take such strong stands in your
> respective positions? I am no one to give you advice, but,
> really, take it easy...
I insist because I consider that as important, what the direction does
not. And be sure that I shall not quit that fight.
If OCaml wants to succeed in the industry, some reflexions must not be
tolerated: the direction of OCaml refuses to understand that elementary
point and prefer think that the problem is me.
> As an aside, what is the purpose of developing Caml Light,
> anyway. Should it not simply be superseded by O'Caml?
It is not developped any more, but there are still users. Therefore,
the bugs are fixed. If I quit developping Camlp4, there will be no
more developpments on it, and it will be like Caml Light: you will be
able to use it, but for the improvements, it is terminated.
--
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-06 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-06 18:55 Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:23 ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-06 19:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:01 ` brogoff
2002-10-06 21:09 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:29 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 20:01 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:24 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-06 20:24 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre [this message]
[not found] ` <200210062143.g96Lhix15834@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
2002-10-07 2:47 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:28 ` Dave Mason
2002-10-06 20:50 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:45 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 21:03 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:46 ` Florian Douetteau
2002-10-07 2:56 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 23:54 ` Markus Mottl
2002-10-07 9:06 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 11:34 ` Kontra, Gergely
2002-10-11 12:56 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-11 13:15 ` [Caml-list] Future " Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-12 21:45 ` Oleg
2002-10-13 9:02 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 16:36 ` [Caml-list] Syntax brogoff
2002-10-07 7:21 ` [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4 Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07 8:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:25 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07 11:30 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:55 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-08 7:57 ` Alessandro Baretta
[not found] ` <nhalm59cf0s.fsf@malabar.mitre.org>
2002-10-08 14:05 ` Alessandro Baretta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021006222436.D20005@verdot.inria.fr \
--to=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox