From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA05456; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:29:42 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA05801 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:29:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lobus.fungible.com (adsl-64-161-114-6.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.161.114.6]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g8IJTd926444 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:29:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by lobus.fungible.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92D177F65; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:27:01 -0700 From-Tims-Fingers: true To: ikeda@msi.co.jp Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-reply-to: <20020918130400I.ikeda@msi.co.jp> (message from IKEDA Katsumi on Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:04:00 +0900) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Client/Server socket communication References: <20020918115148K.ikeda@msi.co.jp> <20020918031351.4EC427F4F@lobus.fungible.com> <20020918130400I.ikeda@msi.co.jp> Message-Id: <20020918192934.92D177F65@lobus.fungible.com> From: tim@fungible.com (Tim Freeman) Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >I try this solution. >But is occurred. >Do I misunderstand your advice? At the place you printed "server parent side", you should have saved the pid that came back from fork and done a wait on it. The call to wait should be something like Unix.waitpid [] pid where pid is the process id that came back from forking the temporary parent. -- Tim Freeman tim@fungible.com GPG public key fingerprint ECDF 46F8 3B80 BB9E 575D 7180 76DF FE00 34B1 5C78 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners