From: Oleg <oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com>
To: Michael Hicks <mwh@cs.umd.edu>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Cyclic ?!
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:26:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208151725.NAA12685@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000301c24468$6cb5b350$6601a8c0@hicks>
Hi
I'm not sure I understand you. If the two definitions are equivalent WRT
Empty <-> None & Node <-> Some name substitution, then the fact that the
compiler accepts one, but not the other must be a bug, yes?
Regards
Oleg
On Thursday 15 August 2002 10:31 am, Michael Hicks wrote:
> If memory serves, ML datatypes elegantly overload about three distrinct
> type-theoretic constructs. In particular, the variant tags in the data
> type definition double as the "witnesses" to coercions between an
> iso-recursive type and its "unrolling" of one level. Without going into
> detail, this is why you can define something like
>
> type foo = Rec of foo;;
>
> but you can't define
>
> type foo = foo;;
>
> The latter definition is in the style of "equi-recursive" types, in
> which a recursive type is equivalent any number of its unrollings. This
> formulation is harder to typecheck, as I recall. There is a similar
> analogy between the two definitions of bin_tree that you present.
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
> [mailto:owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Oleg
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:20 PM
> To: caml-list@inria.fr
> Subject: [Caml-list] Cyclic ?!
>
> Hi
>
> I'm puzzled by the following compiler behavior:
>
> If I define bin_tree as
>
> type 'a bin_tree =
> Empty
>
> | Node of 'a bin_tree * 'a * 'a bin_tree
>
> the compiler accepts it. OTOH if I define it as
>
> type 'a bin_tree = ('a bin_tree * 'a * 'a bin_tree) option
>
> It gives an error: "The type abbreviation bin_tree is cyclic".
> Why??? And what's the difference between the two, really?
>
> Thanks
> Oleg
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives:
> http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ:
> http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-15 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-15 2:19 Oleg
2002-08-15 14:31 ` Michael Hicks
2002-08-15 17:26 ` Oleg [this message]
2002-08-15 18:05 ` Markus Mottl
2002-08-15 18:16 ` Brian Smith
2002-09-24 16:23 ` [Caml-list] Recursive types (Was Cyclic ?!) Christophe Raffalli
2002-08-18 16:13 ` [Caml-list] Cyclic ?! John Max Skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200208151725.NAA12685@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu \
--to=oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mwh@cs.umd.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox