From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>
To: avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru
Cc: garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-mode-3.05
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 23:11:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208070611.g776BaG02942@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D50AF3E.8965A1DE@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> (avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru)
> Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 22:25:18 -0700
> From: "Alexander V. Voinov" <avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> >
> > From: Jeffrey Palmer <jeffrey.palmer@acm.org>
> >
> > > Can anyone give a quick comparison of the Tuareg ocaml mode and
> > > ocaml-mode-3.05? Is the indentation better/standardized in one
> > > vs. the other, support for font-locking, etc.
> >
> > I'm not a Tuareg mode user myself (not surprising)
>
> I'm not in a position to argue on either of these modes, but I use
> tuareg and it satisfies all my needs. I only remember that I switched to
> it from some other mode which was less satisfactory.
>
Although the standard ocaml mode is fine for me when it works, there's one
thing about it that really annoys me: occasionally the indenting engine
gets confused and then totally refuses to do the right thing from then on.
I have to manually re-load the caml-mode emacs files to fix it. Another
thing I don't like is that caml-mode doesn't treat nested comments
correctly as far as syntax coloring is concerned. I guess I should give
tuareg a try.
Mike
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-07 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-05 6:49 Jacques Garrigue
2002-08-06 5:04 ` Blair Zajac
2002-08-06 7:38 ` Jérôme Marant
2002-08-06 9:01 ` Dmitry Bely
2002-08-06 19:23 ` Blair Zajac
2002-08-06 23:37 ` Jeffrey Palmer
2002-08-07 0:18 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-08-07 5:25 ` Alexander V. Voinov
2002-08-07 5:54 ` Yang Shouxun
2002-08-07 23:50 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-08-08 1:19 ` Yang Shouxun
2002-08-12 23:11 ` ocaml-info. was: " Alexander V.Voinov
2002-08-12 23:51 ` Henrik Motakef
2002-08-13 9:23 ` Olivier Andrieu
2002-08-13 21:13 ` Alexander V.Voinov
2002-08-08 6:34 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-08-08 7:12 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-08-07 6:11 ` Michael Vanier [this message]
2002-08-07 6:25 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-08-07 12:34 ` David Fox
2002-08-07 13:37 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-08-09 17:16 ` David Fox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200208070611.g776BaG02942@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu \
--to=mvanier@cs.caltech.edu \
--cc=avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox