From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA31403; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:20:23 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA31407 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:20:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from kraid.nerim.net (kraid.nerim.net [62.4.16.95]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g6CGKLf09283 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:20:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from alan-schm1p.inria.fr (aboukir-101-1-10-alanschmitt.adsl.nerim.net [62.212.98.49]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D0841433 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:14:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alan-schm1p.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3A1D342C3; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:19:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:19:17 +0200 From: Alan Schmitt To: OCaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: productivity improvement Message-ID: <20020712161916.GG3235@alan-schm1p> Mail-Followup-To: OCaml References: <200207081952.PAA28813@hickory.cc.columbia.edu> <001f01c2271e$8037adf0$d100a8c0@warp> <3D2C5B77.6060303@ozemail.com.au> <200207121035.GAA26600@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu> <3D2EDD3B.2080100@ozemail.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2EDD3B.2080100@ozemail.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Editor: Vim http://vim.sf.net/ X-Info: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~aschmitt/ X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.18-6mdk (i686) X-Uptime: 6:16pm up 3:09, 1 user, load average: 1.04, 0.66, 0.40 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk * John Max Skaller (skaller@ozemail.com.au) wrote: > It would be really useful if all the run time parts of Ocaml were given > a simple no bull licence such as 'free for any use' so it was quite clear > that generated code was OWNED by the entity that owned > the inputs. I just took a look at the license, and it says you can distribute executables of your programs as you wish, even if they contain part of the libraries of caml by linking. So I'm not sure I follow what you mean here ... Alan -- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners