From: Shannon --jj Behrens <jjinux@yahoo.com>
To: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile.starynkevitch@cea.fr>,
Oleg <oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] productivity improvement
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:20:22 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020709182022.69599.qmail@web10706.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15658.56034.306342.892408@is002254.saclay.cea.fr>
> Oleg> What are the _simplest_ examples that
> demonstrate
> Oleg> considerable (> 2:1) O'Caml vs C++
> productivity improvement
> Oleg> (in terms of program size) and where can I
> find them?
I wrote a bunch of programs comparing several
languages using two different algorithms ("Simple" and
"Modcount") for finding primes. Eventually, I hope to
throw these up on a Web page, but here is a summary of
the results:
Simple:
C:
Source: 76 lines
Binary: 5833 bytes
Sample Run: 1.56 seconds
Cyclone:
Source: 63 lines
Binary: 127264 bytes
Sample Run: 1.63 seconds
Ocaml:
Source: 35 lines
Binary: 138726 bytes
Sample Run: 3.57 seconds
Python:
Source: 28 lines
Binary: 1629 bytes
Sample Run: 13.6 seconds
ModCount:
C:
Source: 95 lines
Binary: 6020 bytes
Sample Run: 1.08 seconds
Cyclone:
Source: 83 lines
Binary: 127391 bytes
Sample Run: 1.35 seconds
Ocaml:
Source: 54 lines
Binary: 139091 bytes
Sample Run: 3.66 seconds
Python:
Source: 44 lines
Binary: 4054 bytes
Sample Run: 91.8 seconds
Line counts do not include blank lines or comments.
Sample runs were calculated using "time ./executable
5000". Ocaml programs where compiled using the native
compiler. Python binary sizes were taken from .pyo's
which still require the Python interpretter. My
friend did a Java version. It required more lines of
code that OCAML, and was slightly slower. I don't
have the exact numbers, so I haven't written them
here. :(
Here are some of the things that I learned:
1) C is the fastest (of course).
2) Python requires the fewest lines of code.
3) Ocaml provides (in my mind) the best ratio of
execution speed per lines of code.
4) I don't agree that having a higher level language
will often result in using better algorithms, which
compensate for the language overhead.
I have the code of the programs, if you wish.
Best Regards,
-jj
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-09 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-08 19:53 Oleg
2002-07-08 20:14 ` Michael Vanier
2002-07-10 15:50 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-10 18:56 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-10 19:09 ` Jun P.FURUSE
2002-07-11 23:43 ` Pierre Weis
[not found] ` <15657.61603.221054.289184@spike.artisan.com>
2002-07-09 4:43 ` [Caml-list] Universal Serializer (was: productivity improvement) Oleg
2002-07-09 7:56 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2002-07-09 7:59 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2002-07-10 16:06 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-10 22:29 ` Michael Vanier
2002-07-11 8:13 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2002-07-12 12:41 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-14 12:25 ` [Caml-list] Statically detecting arrays bound exceptions ?? (was: Universal Serializer) Berke Durak
2002-07-14 13:24 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-15 8:23 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-07-15 8:39 ` Noel Welsh
2002-07-15 21:22 ` Oleg
2002-07-15 22:44 ` Michael Vanier
2002-07-16 6:43 ` Florian Hars
2002-07-16 20:22 ` [Caml-list] " John Max Skaller
2002-07-16 20:36 ` Johan Baltié
2002-07-16 20:55 ` Hao-yang Wang
2002-07-17 8:25 ` Noel Welsh
2002-07-12 1:41 ` [Caml-list] Universal Serializer (was: productivity improvement) Eray Ozkural
2002-07-12 8:10 ` [Caml-list] OCaml QT bindings Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-07-12 17:30 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-07-12 10:37 ` [Caml-list] Re: productivity improvement Oleg
2002-07-12 11:23 ` Markus Mottl
2002-07-12 11:34 ` Oleg
2002-07-12 11:43 ` Markus Mottl
2002-07-12 12:59 ` Pierre Weis
2002-07-12 16:42 ` Markus Mottl
2002-07-14 20:44 ` Dave Berry
2002-07-14 22:13 ` Markus Mottl
2002-07-15 16:43 ` Alwyn Goodloe
2002-07-16 20:14 ` Dave Berry
2002-07-17 3:21 ` Eric Merritt
2002-07-15 9:39 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-15 8:38 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-17 21:27 ` Dave Berry
2002-10-18 2:48 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-20 12:46 ` Dave Berry
2002-10-21 6:11 ` Michael Vanier
2003-05-10 20:41 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-07-12 11:43 ` Noel Welsh
2002-07-12 12:10 ` Markus Mottl
2002-07-12 13:44 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-12 16:19 ` Alan Schmitt
2002-07-12 20:41 ` John Carr
2002-07-13 21:19 ` [Caml-list] Re: productivity improvementu Pierre Weis
2002-07-12 21:24 ` [Caml-list] Re: productivity improvement Brian Smith
2002-10-15 8:57 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-15 11:50 ` [Caml-list] eproductivity improvement Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-09 12:45 ` [Caml-list] productivity improvement Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2002-07-09 18:20 ` Shannon --jj Behrens [this message]
2002-07-09 19:16 ` Oleg
2002-07-09 20:31 ` Shannon --jj Behrens
2002-07-10 10:02 ` sebastien FURIC
2002-07-10 11:58 ` Dave Mason
2002-07-10 13:11 ` sebastien FURIC
2002-07-10 19:22 ` nadji
2002-07-10 20:15 ` Sieve of Eratosthenes Performance: various languages (Re: [Caml-list] productivity improvement) Oleg
2002-07-10 20:34 ` [Caml-list] " William D. Neumann
2002-07-10 20:47 ` [Caml-list] Re: Sieve of Eratosthenes Performance: various languages Alexander V.Voinov
2002-07-10 21:16 ` William D. Neumann
2002-07-10 20:49 ` [Caml-list] Re: Sieve of Eratosthenes Performance: various languages (Re: [Caml-list] productivity improvement) William D. Neumann
2002-07-11 22:30 ` [Caml-list] Array.resize ? Oleg
2002-07-11 23:06 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-12 13:01 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-12 18:24 ` Shawn Wagner
2002-07-11 23:31 ` Markus Mottl
2002-07-12 12:54 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-12 13:23 ` Olivier Andrieu
2002-07-12 14:05 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-12 16:09 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-10-19 9:16 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-19 22:15 ` [Caml-list] debugger losing contact with debuggee process Lex Stein
2002-10-20 10:06 ` Pierre Weis
2002-10-21 9:11 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-10-18 3:05 ` [Caml-list] Array.resize ? Eray Ozkural
2002-10-19 1:51 ` Oleg
2003-05-10 20:24 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-07-10 20:48 ` Sieve of Eratosthenes Performance: various languages (Re: [Caml-list] productivity improvement) Markus Mottl
2002-07-11 5:53 ` Anton E. Moscal
2002-10-18 3:07 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-07-10 15:39 ` [Caml-list] productivity improvement John Max Skaller
2002-07-11 8:57 ` Nicolas barnier
2002-07-12 12:16 ` [Caml-list] Is this a bug? John Max Skaller
2002-07-12 14:05 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-07-16 3:34 ` [Caml-list] productivity improvement Oleg
2002-10-18 3:13 ` Eray Ozkural
[not found] <200207092004.QAA09587@psi-phi.mit.edu>
2002-07-09 20:16 ` Oleg
[not found] <20020716172916.4903.qmail@web10702.mail.yahoo.com>
2002-07-18 23:14 ` Oleg
2002-07-18 23:27 ` Brian Smith
2002-07-18 23:54 ` William Lovas
2002-07-19 3:59 ` Oleg
[not found] ` <20020719010318.B3631@boson.den.co.bbnow.net>
2002-07-19 8:22 ` Oleg
2002-07-19 8:57 ` Andreas Rossberg
2002-07-19 10:14 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19 18:15 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-19 18:33 ` Brian Smith
2002-07-20 17:30 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-19 19:06 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-20 17:49 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-19 10:34 ` Oleg
2002-07-19 17:25 ` Andreas Rossberg
2002-07-20 16:58 ` John Max Skaller
2002-07-19 16:35 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-10-16 23:24 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-07-19 1:25 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19 4:04 ` Oleg
2002-10-15 9:31 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-15 12:34 ` Oleg
2002-10-15 15:08 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-07-19 4:42 ` Emmanuel Renieris
2002-07-19 9:57 ` Oleg
2002-07-19 10:43 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19 10:52 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-07-19 11:36 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-19 11:10 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-10-15 9:24 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-15 18:47 ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2002-10-17 0:12 ` Eray Ozkural
2002-10-17 9:34 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-10-17 15:55 ` Jeffrey Palmer
2002-10-17 16:15 ` brogoff
2002-10-18 10:43 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-10-21 8:57 ` Francois Pottier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020709182022.69599.qmail@web10706.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=jjinux@yahoo.com \
--cc=basile.starynkevitch@cea.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox