From: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <sacerdot@cs.unibo.it>
To: Alain Frisch <frisch@clipper.ens.fr>
Cc: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>,
Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com>, Ocaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] XML, XSL, eXcetera
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:36:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020705183628.A31146@cs.unibo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.44.0207050123040.29164-100000@clipper.ens.fr>; from frisch@clipper.ens.fr on Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 02:15:27AM +0200
I am sorry to enter the discussion so late, but I am abroad attending
a conference...
My opinion is:
1) We need binding to C implementations of DOM, XSLT, etc. to be able to
do more bindings. For example, we surely want to make bindings to
GUIs (see lablgtk) and complex widgets for rendering XML staff are
based on DOM and related stuff.
The binding me and Luca Padovani did for gdome2 should be considered a
refined, complete, elegant and tested library, as the binding to the MathML
widget. The binding to libxslt is a little toy highly incomplete,
but I have been using it succesfully in the last few months. Moreover
libxslt is quite performant and I know of no serious open bug or
missing feature.
2) XDuce-like stuff would be great but also not standard. I enjoyed
reading the papers, but I also want to keep on using also the ugly
but widespread XSLT.
3) A 100% ocaml XSLT implementation is also something interesting for
several reasons. Nevertheless I am pretty sure that it is a
time-expensive piece of code to write, not at all as simple as it seems.
4) Camlp4 stuff+PXP+XPath would be convenient in the short period, but
absolutely non standard as the XDuce solution and without the advantages
of XDuce. Camlp4 sugar would really be nice once you have a native
XSLT implementation.
To sum up, IMHO solutions 1-3 are different and solve different problems.
4 is not so promising as it seems. Finally it is nice to see some
interest in this field in the ocaml community.
Cheers,
C.S.C.
>
> Well, all this rant to say that ok, (OCaml+PXP+XPath+Camlp4) would be a
> quite appealing solution (and I would probably use it !), but calling it
> the 'ultimate language to process XML' is an overstatement IMHO.
>
>
>
> -- Alain
>
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Real name: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
PhD Student in Computer Science at University of Bologna
E-mail: sacerdot@cs.unibo.it
http://caristudenti.cs.unibo.it/~sacerdot
----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-05 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-04 8:45 forsyth
2002-07-04 18:43 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-04 21:51 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-07-04 22:43 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-05 8:06 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-07-06 14:15 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-04 22:46 ` Henrik Motakef
2002-07-05 0:15 ` Alain Frisch
2002-07-05 16:36 ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen [this message]
2002-07-06 14:22 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-08 12:29 ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0207040823410.30756-100000@vestra.bendery.md>
2002-07-04 8:34 ` Alessandro Baretta
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-03 22:59 Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-03 23:02 ` Alexander V.Voinov
2002-07-04 0:34 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-04 8:33 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020705183628.A31146@cs.unibo.it \
--to=sacerdot@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=alex@baretta.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=frisch@clipper.ens.fr \
--cc=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox