* re : [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...
@ 2002-07-04 11:41 berke
2002-07-04 16:15 ` Alexander V. Voinov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: berke @ 2002-07-04 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dmason, caml-list
I agree. I experienced similar problems with CDK. I just wanted
the X11 code. Had lot of problems, I thought that it didn't
like OpenBSD, I tried on Linux. Also, having to recompile Ocaml
isn't very convenient, and it's tricky to compile CDK with an
already compiled Ocaml (I didn't manage... I haven't spent a full
week on it, though).
So I'd really like to have a CDK that compiles easily and cleanly on
a UNIX box, and that doesn't need a specific Ocaml version. I mean,
patching the compiler to install a X lib doesn't sound good to me.
--
Berke
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: re : [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...
2002-07-04 11:41 re : [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but berke
@ 2002-07-04 16:15 ` Alexander V. Voinov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexander V. Voinov @ 2002-07-04 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: berke; +Cc: dmason, caml-list
Hi
berke@altern.org wrote:
>
> I agree.
I agree with you both. Though I succeeded in recompiling the _full_ CDK
both on Solaris and Linux (never tried win32), it doesn't even approach
the ease and integratedness of Python(+distutils). Though the collection
itself is of course great.
Alexander
I experienced similar problems with CDK. I just wanted
> the X11 code. Had lot of problems, I thought that it didn't
> like OpenBSD, I tried on Linux. Also, having to recompile Ocaml
> isn't very convenient, and it's tricky to compile CDK with an
> already compiled Ocaml (I didn't manage... I haven't spent a full
> week on it, though).
>
> So I'd really like to have a CDK that compiles easily and cleanly on
> a UNIX box, and that doesn't need a specific Ocaml version. I mean,
> patching the compiler to install a X lib doesn't sound good to me.
> --
> Berke
>
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-04 16:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-04 11:41 re : [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but berke
2002-07-04 16:15 ` Alexander V. Voinov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox