From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA08375; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:23:44 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA08279 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:23:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from str12.sobor.org (adsl-63-198-183-99.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.198.183.99]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g61LNff13918 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:23:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by str12.sobor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934A199860 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 14:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020701.142102.74735914.avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] ocamlopt, win32, multithreaded DLL From: "Alexander V.Voinov" X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi I've found the following message in the archive: http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200011/msg00086.html which actually states that for this port of OCaml libcmt is preferred over msvcrt. Did anything changed since then? What is the reason to retain (and recompile) libunix on win32? Because my perception is that most of closed-source vendors prefer to link against msvcrt and one may appear stuck with the library mismatch. Thank you Alexander ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners