From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: skaller@ozemail.com.au
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Is CVS version of ocaml faster?
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:03:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020522120351X.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CEA931F.6090700@ozemail.com.au>
From: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
> I just built the CVS version of Ocaml
>
> Objective Caml version 3.04+11 (2002-05-16)
>
> to check out a fix. Felix seems to run correctly now.
>
> ***** All 201 tests passed *****
Good
> But .. it seems faster, for example my parser builds in 5 seconds ..
> was 20 seconds. Am I imagining things?
There's a small optimization in the type checker, which can improve
performance if you have lots of mutually recursive types. It's rather
application specific, so I wouldn't say it would improve performance
for everybody, but you can have good surprises. Some exponential cases
become linear.
Jacques Garrigue
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-22 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 21:48 [Caml-list] Stack Overflow... (recursion in try-statement) Oliver Bandel
2002-04-23 22:23 ` Will Benton
2002-04-23 22:50 ` Oliver Bandel
2002-04-23 23:25 ` John Prevost
2002-05-21 18:34 ` [Caml-list] Is CVS version of ocaml faster? John Max Skaller
2002-05-22 3:03 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2002-05-22 16:29 ` John Max Skaller
2002-06-30 17:25 ` [Caml-list] ocamllex -- ambiguous regex John Max Skaller
2002-07-01 11:45 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-06-30 17:27 ` [Caml-list] Manual broken -- set John Max Skaller
2002-04-24 1:01 ` [Caml-list] Stack Overflow... (recursion in try-statement) Warp
2002-04-24 13:22 ` Oliver Bandel
2002-04-24 4:10 ` John Prevost
2002-04-24 4:52 ` Alan Schmitt
2002-04-24 5:31 ` Charles Martin
2002-04-24 13:25 ` Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020522120351X.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--to=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=skaller@ozemail.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox