From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA13413; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:13:08 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA13487 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:13:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA11151 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:02:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.44.193]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g4772Sv01859; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:02:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lambda.u-strasbg.fr (lambda.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.90.63]) by dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA27441; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:02:58 +0200 Received: from luther by lambda.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 174z6Q-0005xS-00; Tue, 07 May 2002 09:09:38 +0200 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:09:38 +0200 To: "Jun P.FURUSE" Cc: laurent.cheno@noos.fr, caml-list@inria.fr, advi@pauillac.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Make opt in camlimages Message-ID: <20020507070938.GB22865@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> References: <7B075E8C-5F5D-11D6-B5E6-000A27B45EBA@noos.fr> <20020504.150731.730574136.Jun.Furuse@inria.fr> <20020505133304.GA16064@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> <20020506.124240.846950275.Jun.Furuse@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020506.124240.846950275.Jun.Furuse@inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Sven Luther Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk BTW, about advi, i have gotten a bug report claiming that kpathsea handles the virtual font stuff, but i am not able to confirm it. I asked the reporter to check on this and inform me back if this is the case. If this is the case, s font handling would be quite easy if i understood correctly, only the calls to gsftopk would be needed. If you are interrested, i got quite a number of bugreports from different people for advi, some of them easy to solve (mostly packaging dependencies issues), but i say this here to show that there seemed to be quite some interrest in advi, since lot of people checked on it. Friendly, Sven LUther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners