Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Luther <luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>
To: "Jun P.FURUSE" <Jun.Furuse@inria.fr>
Cc: laurent.cheno@noos.fr, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Make opt in camlimages
Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 15:33:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020505133304.GA16064@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020504.150731.730574136.Jun.Furuse@inria.fr>

On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:07:31PM +0200, Jun P.FURUSE wrote:
> > %sudo make installopt
> > make: *** No rule to make target `installopt'. Stop.
> > 
> > Is that normal ?
> > 
> > Thank you in advance, best regards,
> 
> Sorry, there was a bug inside INSTALL.
> Now, make install also installs the native code version.

Jun, i suppose you do know that not all arches support the native code
version. What will happen if i type make install on such an arch (i
don't know the camlimages makefile, but when typing make install on such
an arch in advi, it will try to install advi.opt as advi, which of
course will not work, since there is no advi.opt).

I, as a debian developper who has to have packages build on near to 11
different plateforms, half of whom without native code compiler, would
like very much that the installation of bytecode only is not forgotten
in the Makefiles.

If needed i can provide patches for it, but i think it is no big issues
for the authors of ocaml packages to take this fact into acount, and
write makefiles who will work for all arches without needing patching.

Anyway, thank you for your great work on camlimages and other stuff.

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-05 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-04 12:50 Laurent Chéno
2002-05-04 13:07 ` Jun P.FURUSE
2002-05-05 13:33   ` Sven Luther [this message]
2002-05-06 10:42     ` Jun P.FURUSE
2002-05-07  7:06       ` Sven Luther
2002-05-07  7:09       ` Sven Luther
2002-05-07 10:05         ` Achim Blumensath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020505133304.GA16064@lambda.u-strasbg.fr \
    --to=luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=Jun.Furuse@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=laurent.cheno@noos.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox