From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA29596; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:29:05 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA29553 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:29:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from VL-MS-MR001.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g3NFT3v03579 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:29:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from vincent ([66.130.50.101]) by VL-MS-MR001.sc1.videotron.ca (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GV11OF04.VZV for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:29:03 -0400 Received: from vince by vincent with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1702Dg-0007yx-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:28:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:28:39 -0400 To: OCaml Mailing list Subject: [Caml-list] Re: What is this? Message-ID: <20020423152839.GA30671@vincent> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Vincent Foley Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Can anyone explain why I see my email address in the sender field even though I never wrote this? On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:18:04AM -0400, vinfoley@pop.ifrance.com wrote: > Received: from localhost (oliver@localhost) by first.in-berlin.de (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA00668; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:50:40 +0200 > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:50:40 +0200 (MET DST) > From: Oliver Bandel > To: John Max Skaller > cc: Tim Freeman , willb@cs.wisc.edu, stf@apl.it, > caml-list@inria.fr > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlSDL > In-Reply-To: <3CC34396.9000909@ozemail.com.au> > Message-ID: > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr > Precedence: bulk > > Tk is designed for interactive GUI-Applications. And, yes, > it provides graphical output with the canvas-widget. > > But I think that OpenGL is designed for having 3D-animations > and similar stuff, and not to put buttons on the screen, > on which the user can click. > And I think you have to reinvent the "button-wheel" in OpenGL. > > Maybe it would be a good idea to marriage OpenGL and Tk, > so that Tk provides easy GUI-design and OpenGL provides > powerful 3D-capabilities. > > Maybe there should be a GUI-Lib for OpenGL, or a 3D-canvas- > widget for Tk (OpenGL-canvas for Tk). > > Ciao, > Oliver > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ---end quoted text--- -- Vincent Foley-Bourgon Email: vinfoley@iquebec.com Homepage: http://darkhost.mine.nu:81 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners