From: Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: QT Bindings [Was: Re: [Caml-list] LablGtk]
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:37:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020223083725.A32588@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020222125524.GB1403@cs.unibo.it>; from zack@cs.unibo.it on Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:55:24PM +0100
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:55:24PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:11:39PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> > I know, GTK is far from ideal. But it's still the easiest thing to
> > interface with, after Tcl/Tk. Qt is so tightly bound to C++.
>
> I'm interested in ohter opinions about this.
> A while ago I've looked for OCaml QT bindings but I find nothing, so I
> looked at it thinking to write them but seems to me that the real work
> is really really huge.
> Anyway I haven't looked at it enough deeper to see the ocaml related
> problems.
>
> What are the intrinsic problems related to QT bindings coding?
As i understood it, the main problem is that it is more difficult to interface
with C++ than with C. I don't know the details, but that is the answer you
will get if reading the previous thread on this mailing list.
The second hindrance is naturally, as you said, it is really heavy work, and
there need to be someone working on it. I always thought some kind of semi
automatism would help a lot here though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-23 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-21 22:10 [Caml-list] LablGtk Nicolas FRANCOIS
2002-02-21 23:34 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-02-22 2:41 ` Nicolas FRANCOIS
2002-02-22 3:11 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-02-22 12:55 ` QT Bindings [Was: Re: [Caml-list] LablGtk] Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-02-23 7:37 ` Sven [this message]
2002-02-23 7:44 ` Henrik Motakef
2002-02-22 13:26 ` [Caml-list] LablGtk Nicolas FRANCOIS
2002-02-22 14:45 ` Nicolas FRANCOIS
2002-02-22 15:03 ` Nicolas FRANCOIS
2002-02-23 15:20 ` [Caml-list] LablGtk : found the solution :-P Nicolas FRANCOIS
2002-02-22 8:10 ` [Caml-list] LablGtk Johann Spies
2002-02-22 9:14 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-02-22 12:37 ` Johann Spies
2002-02-22 13:09 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-02-22 14:35 ` Johann Spies
2002-02-22 9:08 ` Maxence Guesdon
2002-02-23 2:40 ` Nicolas FRANCOIS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020223083725.A32588@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--to=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox