From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA13921; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:47:23 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA14005 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:47:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g16JlMn18141 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:47:22 +0100 (MET) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA15873 for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:47:22 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:47:22 +0100 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] what is the revised syntax? Message-ID: <20020206204722.C15786@verdot.inria.fr> References: <20020206124513.B15370@cilantro.cs.wisc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020206124513.B15370@cilantro.cs.wisc.edu>; from willb@cs.wisc.edu on Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:45:13PM -0600 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:45:13PM -0600, Will Benton wrote: > All this syntax talk has gotten me curious: is there a web page or > document somewhere that details the salient differences between the > revised and standard syntaxes? http://caml.inria.fr/camlp4/tutorial/tutorial004.html -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr