From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA00032; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:55:42 +0100 (MET) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA32273 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:55:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA19679 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:47:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from obento.cs.caltech.edu (obento.cs.caltech.edu [131.215.44.101]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g15LlX923718 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:47:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from orchestra.cs.caltech.edu (orchestra.cs.caltech.edu [131.215.44.20]) by obento.cs.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E1B405F for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:47:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mvanier@localhost) by orchestra.cs.caltech.edu (8.11.2/8.9.3) id g15LlVL25141; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:47:31 -0800 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:47:31 -0800 Message-Id: <200202052147.g15LlVL25141@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: orchestra.cs.caltech.edu: mvanier set sender to mvanier@cs.caltech.edu using -f From: Michael Vanier To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] syntax Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk I've looked at the revised syntax, and I like most of what I see (except for the use of x.val instead of !x). One question: how many shift-reduce conflicts does the revised syntax have? Mike ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr