From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA16448; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:34:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA16311 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:34:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from ritchie.cas.mcmaster.ca (ritchie.cas.McMaster.CA [130.113.68.10]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g15JYrH04062 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:34:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from solon.cas.mcmaster.ca (solon.cas.McMaster.CA [130.113.68.195]) by ritchie.cas.mcmaster.ca (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g15JYmj14670 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:34:48 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kahl@localhost) by solon.cas.mcmaster.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) id g15JW6104877; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:32:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:32:06 -0500 Message-Id: <200202051932.g15JW6104877@solon.cas.mcmaster.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: solon.cas.mcmaster.ca: kahl set sender to kahl@cas.mcmaster.ca using -f From: Wolfram Kahl To: caml-list@inria.fr In-reply-to: <20020205193258.C32589@gogol.zorgol> (message from Berke Durak on Tue, 5 Feb 2002 19:32:58 +0100) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The solution to the syntax war References: <20020205193258.C32589@gogol.zorgol> Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Berke Durak wrote: > I think the Caml team should impose a new syntax with the next big change > in Ocaml. And if they really do it, they should make the syntax look more like Haskell ;-) How about a new OCaml-syntax-list? Wolfram, who has changed from Caml Special Light to Labl Special Light, then through all versions of OLabl, and back to OCaml through all its labelised variants starting from 2.99 (with 30kloc) ... ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr