From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA05739; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 22:26:54 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA05714 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 22:26:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from menyapa.cc.columbia.edu (menyapa.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.38]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fBVLQpH16687 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 22:26:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from there (tw304h3.cpmc.columbia.edu [156.111.84.180]) by menyapa.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA03116 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 16:26:47 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200112312126.QAA03116@menyapa.cc.columbia.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Alec To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] SML syntax with O'Caml Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 16:26:46 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi I understand that O'Caml performs better on benchmarks than other ML language family compilers, while O'Caml syntax is (probably unfortunately) different from the standard. Is it possible to get SML syntax with O'Caml "compiler engine"? Thanks Alec P.S. Happy New Year! ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr