From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: patrick@watson.org
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Objects and private methods
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:06:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011221140658Z.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011220215627.C91723-100000@fledge.watson.org>
> I'm having some trouble getting the following type of structure to
> type-check:
>
> class type a = object method get_b : a end
>
> and b = object method b : unit end
>
> class a_impl =
> (object (self)
> method get_b = (self :> b)
> method private b = ()
> end : a)
> ;;
>
> This produces the error message:
>
> The class type object method b : unit method get_b : b end
> is not matched by the class type a
> The public method b cannot be hidden
>
> I would have expected the failure to occur when coercing to type 'b' as
> the method is declared private (which does not match the signature).
Due to the way privacy attributes are implemented in the type checker,
a type annotation can force a private method to become public (but
never the opposite). You can see it on the following example.
# class c = object (self : < b : 'a; .. >) method private b = 1 end;;
class c : object method b : int end
This explains why the type checker doesn't complain about b not being
public: it makes it public as needed. And since b is public, you
cannot hide it.
(This may seem strange from the point of view of privacy, but you
should just understand private methods as "may be hidden in a
subclass"; if unified with a public method it may no longe be hidden.)
> The basic idea is that the class 'a_impl' implements 'b' privately. This
> seems like something that should be possible to do. I suspect that the
> coercion of self to 'b' is causing the problem here.
I don't understand very well what you mean by "implement privately":
a and b do not seem to be related in your code.
I will suppose that you meant
class type a = object method get_b : b end
You cannot convert something from private to public through a coercion
(this is different from forcing it with an annotation). This is
because the values are actually different: a private method and a
public method have different internal representations.
On the other hand, you can hide a method through coercions.
class a_impl = object (self)
method get_b = (self :> b)
method b = ()
end
let new_a = (new a_impl :> a)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Garrigue Kyoto University garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp
<A HREF=http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~garrigue/>JG</A>
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-21 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-21 3:02 Patrick M Doane
2001-12-21 5:06 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2001-12-21 5:29 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-12-21 8:40 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011221140658Z.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--to=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=patrick@watson.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox