From: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>
To: Alain Frisch <frisch@clipper.ens.fr>
Cc: Willem Duminy <WDuminy@mweb.com>,
"Caml-List (E-mail)" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Pairs vs. Records
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:26:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011213212619.B5755@pauillac.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0112112239470.16776-100000@clipper.ens.fr>; from frisch@clipper.ens.fr on Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:48:22PM +0100
> > This is very surprising indeed, because the OCaml compilers generate
> > *exactly the same code* for building/accessing tuples and for
> > building/accessing records (with no mutable fields).
>
> I guess you know this better than I ;) but one can observe difference in
> generated code with pattern matching:
> # fun x y -> match (x,y) with (a,b) -> a + b;;
> # fun x y -> match {row=x;col=y} with {row=a;col=b} -> a + b;;
Actually, you're correct. I was thinking in terms of using records or
tuples inside data structures, but it's true that there are two
"toplevel" uses of tuples that are optimized specially: one is for
matching multiple values, as in your first example above; the other
(specific to ocamlopt) is when passing a tuple of arguments to a known
function that expects a tuple of the same size, e.g.
let f (x, y) = ...
... f (e1, e2) ...
Here, ocamlopt can avoid the construction of the pair, but similar
code using records instead of pairs will not be optimized.
Sorry for spreading misinformation :-)
- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-13 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-11 14:36 Willem Duminy
2001-12-11 21:09 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-12-11 21:48 ` Alain Frisch
2001-12-13 20:26 ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011213212619.B5755@pauillac.inria.fr \
--to=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=WDuminy@mweb.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=frisch@clipper.ens.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox