From: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>
To: Mattias Waldau <mattias.waldau@abc.se>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Beware of compare (and Ocaml beaten by Java)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:21:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011127102130.A16765@pauillac.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAEBJHFJOIPMMIILCEPBCECKDFAA.mattias.waldau@abc.se>; from mattias.waldau@abc.se on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:40:00PM +0100
> Why isn't compare compiled as '-'? According to the definition
> of compare this should be okay.
I assume you mean "compare at type int -> int -> int", because for
types represented as pointers, pointer subtraction wouldn't give
reliable results -- for one thing, the GC can move blocks around.
Even on integer arguments, "-" cannot be used due to arithmetic
overflow:
compare min_int max_int = -1 (* correct *)
min_int - max_int = 1 (* incorrect *)
So, replacing "compare" by "-" is only valid for small integer types
such as "char" and enumerated datatypes, and I felt this wasn't
important enough to implement. (Given your example, you'll disagree,
of course.)
> The core of the slow program is
>
> (* compare two substrings of the SAME text
> [compare x y] returns [0] if [x=y], a negative integer if
> [x<y], and a positive integer if [x>y] *)
> let rec same_substr_compare str idx1 idx2 : int =
> let length = String.length str in
> (* shortest string is smaller *)
> if idx1 = length then -1 else
> if idx2 = length then 1 else
> (* compare one char *)
> let res = compare str.[idx1] str.[idx2] in
> (* char was equal, recurse *)
> if res = 0 then same_substr_compare str (idx1+1) (idx2+1)
> (* char was different, finished *)
> else res ;;
I get the impression that same_substr_compare never returns 0; is this
intentional?
> 3. Mergesort (=Array.stable_sort) is faster than
> heapsort (=Array.sort). (runtime down from 60s to 40s).
> (I also tried quicksort (=Sort.array), but after 8 hours
> it still hadn't finished.)
This is a bit surprising: you might have hit one of those cases where
Quicksort is O(n^2), but it could also be the case that Sort.array
malfunctions because your comparison function is not a proper
comparison function (it doesn't return 0 for equal things).
- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-27 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 17:53 [Caml-list] replay debugger Yoann Padioleau
2001-10-04 12:39 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-11-26 14:51 ` Fergus Henderson
2001-11-26 16:14 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-11-26 18:40 ` [Caml-list] Beware of compare (and Ocaml beaten by Java) Mattias Waldau
2001-11-27 9:21 ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
2001-11-27 9:41 ` Mattias Waldau
2001-11-30 9:12 ` Pierre Weis
2001-12-03 21:37 ` Chris Hecker
2001-11-27 17:03 ` [Caml-list] bytegen.comp_expr error when doing object copying Neil Inala
2001-11-28 20:15 ` Xavier Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011127102130.A16765@pauillac.inria.fr \
--to=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mattias.waldau@abc.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox