From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA08165; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:54:27 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA08069 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:54:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id fA99p2j27015; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:51:02 +0100 (MET) Received: (from vouillon@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA08197; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:51:01 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:51:01 +0100 From: Jerome Vouillon To: Christophe Raffalli Cc: ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] debugger backtracking/checkpoints Message-ID: <20011109105101.A7004@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <15338.41290.974934.699214@heplix4.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> <3BEAC930.E0BD9702@univ-savoie.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <3BEAC930.E0BD9702@univ-savoie.fr>; from Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:04:32PM +0100 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:04:32PM +0100, Christophe Raffalli wrote: > In fact you should be able to have a next-back insteed of a step-back and see > in which funtion you will enter if you step back to be able to choose between > the two. [...] > Is it too difficult to add such a feature ? It's already there: - "previous" will step-back skipping over function calls - "start" will execute the program backwards until the current function is exited -- Jerome ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr