From: Christophe TROESTLER <debian00@tiscalinet.be>
To: "O'Caml Mailing List" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Array Optimizations
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 22:11:18 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011105.221118.74322497.debian00@tiscalinet.be> (raw)
Hi all,
The following paper (that I found by chance)
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/Courses/cs612/2001SP/projects/ocaml-arrays/OCaml.pdf
describes a set of optimizations that improves array access speed in
Caml _without_loosing_bound_checking_ (contrarily to the -unsafe
option). The performance gain on their examples looks good, in fact
they even beat gcc in some cases! In their words:
The final performance of MMM surpasses even that of the
best-case baseline kernel --- the linearized 1D Array with
bounds checking disabled --- yet without sacrificing the
safety of bounds checking or requiring the programmer to
linearize accesses.
and
We conclude that OCaml could be a serious contender against
languages such as C and Fortran for use in numerically
intensive computation.
Is there anything like that (to be) implemented into the OCaml
compilers? I believe many people besides myself will be interested to
have the power of Caml available with extremely good array access
times in loops.
Keep up with the good work!
Cheers,
ChriS
P.S. As outlined in the paper, the Bigarray library is really slow
(much slower than the standard Array). Given its (other)
capabilities, it is tempting to use it for numeric processing however.
Until this is solved, shouldn't there be a warning somewhere (in the
manual?).
Related links:
--------------
Array Data Dependence Analysis
http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/omega/sectionstar3_1.html
The Omega Project:
http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/omega/
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/Courses/cs612/2001SP/projects/ocaml-arrays/
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next reply other threads:[~2001-11-05 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-05 21:11 Christophe TROESTLER [this message]
2001-11-06 15:51 ` Thorsten Ohl
2001-11-07 12:20 ` Rolf Wester
2001-11-07 20:10 ` David McClain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011105.221118.74322497.debian00@tiscalinet.be \
--to=debian00@tiscalinet.be \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox