From: Andrew Lawson <andrew@absentis.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Passing self to a new object
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 20:30:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011029203036.A1039@alba.sw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011029180207D.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; from garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 06:02:07PM +0900
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 06:02:07PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> From: Andrew Lawson <andrew@absentis.com>
>
> > I'm writing a gui program where the callback for a button
> > creates a new object (also a gui) and needs to pass it a reference to
> > itself in order that the new object can contact the original for
> > information. The classes look something like this;
> >
> > class xyz =
> > let top = ... in
> > let ... = ... in
> > object (self)
> > method btnNew = ... ~command:(fun () = new abc self) top in
> > ...
> > ...
> > end
> >
> > and abc (parent:xyz) =
> > object (self)
> > var myparent = parent
> > ...
> > end
> >
> >My error is;
> > .....
> > Self type cannot escape its class
>
> You've bumped into a painful quirk of ocaml's object system: self's
> type is not xyz, and must be handled with care.
Ouch, I knew that even such an otherwise nice language would turn
out to have some fuzzy bits someday :)
> (By the way, your program seemed strange, since you were using self
> and abc before defining them, but I suppose it was a copy error, and I
> corrected it.)
I admit this was a quick example of the problem, not the program
itself, which has many more hairy bits.
> The general solution to this is to first define a class type:
> class type xyz_t = object ('self)
> method
> btnNew : ...
> ...
> end
Well this gives me an excuse to start playing with types and
interfaces anyway. Is this a 'known problem, will be sorted
eventually' or a 'just live with it' sort of thing?
> Then change the code in btnNew to
> new abc (self :> xyz_t)
Casting! and here was I giving a C++ programmer some abuse
about this last week :)
> Remark that making xyz_t exact may be a bit lengthy, but you may leave
> out methods you don't need to call from abc.
Well, thats not so bad then ... I suppose good style should ahve
me doing this anyway.
> Hope this helps,
Most definitely
> Jacques Garrigue
Thanks very much
Andrew
--
Andrew Lawson
andrew@absentis.com
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-29 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-28 15:56 Andrew Lawson
2001-10-29 9:02 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-10-29 20:30 ` Andrew Lawson [this message]
2001-10-30 8:09 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011029203036.A1039@alba.sw \
--to=andrew@absentis.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox