From: Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
To: bcpierce@cis.upenn.edu
Cc: Dave Berry <Dave@kal.com>,
Maxence Guesdon <maxence.guesdon@inria.fr>,
Jerome Vouillon <jerome.vouillon@inria.fr>,
Francois Pottier <francois.pottier@inria.fr>,
caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:33:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011010153339.C3177@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4066.1002712085@saul.cis.upenn.edu>; from bcpierce@saul.cis.upenn.edu on Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 07:08:05AM -0400
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 07:08:05AM -0400, Benjamin C. Pierce wrote:
> > I think you missed the point of Jerome's suggestion, which was (** ...
> > *) vs. (* ... **). (Either that, or I missed his point...). So my
> > variant was to show the difference at the start of each comment, where
> > it would be more immediate.
>
> Aha -- sorry, I did miss the point. So I'd like to make another a
> variant proposal... :-)
>
> - The comment is before the element:
> (** fun 1 *)
> val f : t
> (** fun 2 *)
> val g : u
>
> - The comment is after the element:
> val f : t
> (** fun 1 *)
> val g : u
> (** fun 2 *)
>
> - The comment is on the same line as the element:
> val f : t (** fun 1 *)
> val g : u (** fun 2 *)
> (Most useful for record fields, probably.)
>
> I.e., *one* kind of (not very) funny comment marker, plus using the
> indentation to decide whether the comment binds to the expression before
> or after:
>
> if the comment is on a line by itself,
> then if its indentation is the same as the following (non-comment) line
> then it goes with the following
> else it goes with the preceding
> else it goes with the line it's on.
Personnaly, i would be very strongly against using indentation to define if
the stuff is before or after, after all, not everyone wants to indent things
the same way.
The (*< and (*> idea seems good and very intuitive. what is the reproch
against it you have ?
Another idea would be (but more cumbersome, and much less readable) :
(** comment before *)
(* comment after **)
or even (*< comment before **) and (** comment before >*)
(or maybe the other way around)
But still this is less handy when longer comments are used.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-10 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-09 12:30 Dave Berry
2001-10-10 11:08 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-10 13:33 ` Sven [this message]
2001-10-10 14:10 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-10-12 6:23 ` Francois Pottier
2001-10-12 6:50 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-10-10 15:12 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-10 15:25 ` Stefano Lanzavecchia
2001-10-10 15:39 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-10 15:44 ` Stefano Lanzavecchia
2001-10-10 18:45 ` Maxence Guesdon
2001-10-10 19:38 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-11 7:23 ` Florian Hars
2001-10-12 6:28 ` Francois Pottier
2001-10-12 9:10 ` Sven
2001-10-12 9:39 ` Markus Mottl
[not found] ` <9q7886$2p8$1@qrnik.zagroda>
2001-10-13 9:19 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-10-10 15:36 ` Thorsten Ohl
2001-10-10 17:10 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-10-10 19:39 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-10 15:25 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-10 17:07 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-10-10 17:25 ` Sven
2001-10-10 17:44 ` [Caml-list] Re: Emacs comment support (was OCamldoc) Patrick M Doane
[not found] ` <Pine.BSF.3.96.1011010133900.56825G-100000@fledge.watson.or g>
2001-10-10 19:25 ` Chris Hecker
2001-10-11 19:32 ` [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc Xavier Leroy
2001-10-12 8:29 ` Andreas Rossberg
2001-10-12 8:57 ` Didier Remy
2001-10-12 9:27 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2001-10-12 10:36 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-12 13:13 ` Francois Pottier
2001-10-12 17:23 ` Alan Schmitt
2001-10-13 11:49 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-13 13:46 ` Jimmie Houchin
2001-10-14 12:50 ` Frank Atanassow
[not found] ` <9q4tft$88t$1@qrnik.zagroda>
2001-10-11 20:13 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
[not found] <9q1pg2$85h$1@qrnik.zagroda>
2001-10-10 15:35 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-09 11:40 Dave Berry
2001-10-09 12:14 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-09 9:42 Dave Berry
2001-10-09 17:26 ` Maxence Guesdon
2001-10-10 13:29 ` Sven
2001-10-14 2:05 ` Mike Leary
2001-10-08 21:21 Maxence Guesdon
2001-10-09 6:26 ` [Caml-list] " Francois Pottier
2001-10-09 10:20 ` Jerome Vouillon
2001-10-09 11:41 ` Eric C. Cooper
2001-10-09 17:30 ` Maxence Guesdon
2001-10-09 14:26 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-10-09 21:12 ` rbw3
2001-10-10 9:19 ` Francois Pottier
2001-10-10 12:35 ` rbw3
2001-10-10 13:26 ` Sven
2001-10-09 14:46 ` Maxence Guesdon
2001-10-09 8:53 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011010153339.C3177@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--to=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=Dave@kal.com \
--cc=bcpierce@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=francois.pottier@inria.fr \
--cc=jerome.vouillon@inria.fr \
--cc=maxence.guesdon@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox