From: Frank Atanassow <franka@cs.uu.nl>
To: Markus Mottl <markus@mail4.ai.univie.ac.at>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Newbie list
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:03:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010913170344.A22378@cs.uu.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010913151932.A2510@chopin.ai.univie.ac.at>; from markus@mail4.ai.univie.ac.at on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:19:32PM +0200
Markus Mottl wrote (on 13-09-01 15:19 +0200):
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Frank Atanassow wrote:
> > There have been a lot of beginner questions on this list of late and,
> > though there are still peaks and troughs, the traffic has increased
> > noticeably. I have no problems with beginners asking questions, and
> > indeed I have answered at least one such post myself at length, but I
> > think perhaps the rest of us might be better served if a separate list
> > were established for them, say `caml-newbie' or `caml-cafe'. `caml-list'
> > would remain the default list for announcements and general discussion.
> >
> > Does anyone favor such a proposal?
>
> A very difficult question indeed: if we do this, the advanced users may
> find more time for productive development work, but who would answer
> the newbies' questions then? OTOH, it might be very effective to let
> the newbies teach themselves in a kind of "caml-cradle". Knowledge
> (and lack thereof) is usually distributed so newbies are not unlikely
> to solve most basic issues in cooperation.
I might subscribe to the newbies list and answer questions myself. The reason
I want a separate newbie list is that I can unsubscribe from it when I get
busy without missing the other discussions and announcements.
Also, I at least might be more inclined to answer newbie questions on a
separate list because such a list would be specifically set up for that
purpose. To be honest, I am a little uncomfortable posting such messages here,
because I know that for most, or at least many, subscribers they are
superfluous, and may be regarded as a nuisance.
Finally, newbie questions often get many similar replies, and partly because
of the delay between posting and bouncing, I don't know that my post won't be
redundant; on a newbie list I might be less worried about that.
--
Frank Atanassow, Information & Computing Sciences, Utrecht University
Padualaan 14, PO Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
Tel +31 (030) 253-3261 Fax +31 (030) 251-379
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-13 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-13 12:49 Frank Atanassow
2001-09-13 13:19 ` Markus Mottl
2001-09-13 14:35 ` Alan Schmitt
2001-09-13 15:24 ` Markus Mottl
2001-09-13 16:29 ` Collin Monahan
2001-09-14 14:20 ` Felix Terkhorn
2001-09-13 15:03 ` Frank Atanassow [this message]
2001-09-13 18:32 ` Mike Leary
2001-09-14 5:22 ` Alan Schmitt
2001-09-14 6:40 ` Sven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010913170344.A22378@cs.uu.nl \
--to=franka@cs.uu.nl \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=markus@mail4.ai.univie.ac.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox