From: Alex Cowie <cowie@cs.unisa.edu.au>
To: STARYNKEVITCH Basile <Basile.Starynkevitch@cea.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr, cowie@cs.unisa.edu.au
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Different types of streams
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 18:43:58 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200109050913.SAA29689@reason.levels.unisa.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2001 10:02:59 +0200." <15253.56371.266115.924816@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Basile Starynkevitch wrote "Wed, 05 Sep 2001 10:02:59 +0200." :
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr> writes:
> Daniel> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 03:03:35AM +0200,
> Daniel> Christian RINDERKNECHT wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> As an aside: the performance of my parser was not a concern,
> >> feasability was the main challenge. I nevertheless understand
> >> it can be an important issue. I understood there was a plan to
> >> remove the [< >] from OCaml, and to request users using camlp4,
> >> is it correct?
>
> Daniel> Yes. Is it a problem?
>
> Perhaps. standard Ocaml input is done (with the exception of low level
> input such as Pervasives.read_line etc....) with the "19.10 Module
> Genlex: a generic lexical analyzer" whose documentation mentions
> explicitly the [< >] construct.
>
> Several ocaml programs would like to do input without a specific lexer
> or a parser. This is done thu Genlex which need the [< >] construct.
>
> I suggest maintaining the [< >] for a while -ie for several years-
> (perhaps marking it explicitly as deprecated in the documentation). It
> should be probably acceptable to have the [< >] construct handled by a
> standard campl4 module, especially if/when camlp4 will be merged into
> the main ocaml package.
>
I would strongly support Basile's proposal to retain the [< >] in Ocaml core
syntax. I have been using Caml/Ocaml for 5-6 years and I have found that a
high proportion of the programs I have written recently have used [< >] stream
parsing. The convenience of having this parsing facility within the Ocaml
syntax should not be underestimated particularly for program development under
the toplevel.
> Should the Genlex module be deprecated, a newer way of making high
> level input should be proposed. My opinion is that it should *not* be
> modelled on C's infamous scanf.
>
> Formatted input should particularily well be explained, since it is a
> function needed by all newcomers. The first program you write is a
> hello world, and the second one asks for your name and age and tells
> you hello :-)
>
>
> Best regards to all
>
>
> [**resumé en français: deleted]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Basile STARYNKEVITCH ---- Commissariat à l Energie Atomique * France
> DRT/LIST/DTSI/SLA * CEA/Saclay b.528 (p111f) * 91191 GIF/YVETTE CEDEX
> work email: Basile point Starynkevitch at cea point fr
> home email: Basile point Starynkevitch at wanadoo point fr
> -------------------
Alex Cowie
Research Fellow, Advanced Computing Research Centre
University of South Australia
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-05 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-26 18:23 Nicolas George
2001-08-27 9:49 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-08-27 17:47 ` Nicolas George
2001-08-28 8:20 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-08-28 9:33 ` Nicolas George
2001-08-29 8:39 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-09-05 1:03 ` Christian RINDERKNECHT
2001-09-05 7:34 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-09-05 8:02 ` STARYNKEVITCH Basile
2001-09-05 9:10 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-09-05 9:13 ` Alex Cowie [this message]
2001-09-05 9:30 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-09-05 10:58 ` Dave Mason
2001-09-05 12:06 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-09-05 12:56 ` Dave Mason
2001-09-05 14:01 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-09-05 13:29 ` Nicolas George
2001-09-05 14:30 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-09-05 14:44 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-09-05 14:55 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-09-05 19:39 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-09-05 14:49 ` [Caml-list] Camlp4 and CamlIDL in main distribution? Markus Mottl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200109050913.SAA29689@reason.levels.unisa.edu.au \
--to=cowie@cs.unisa.edu.au \
--cc=Basile.Starynkevitch@cea.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox