From: Miles Egan <miles@caddr.com>
To: Alain Frisch <frisch@clipper.ens.fr>
Cc: Caml list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Libraries in the distribution
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:05:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010823110525.A5828@caddr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.04.10108231837060.26026-100000@clipper.ens.fr>; from frisch@clipper.ens.fr on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 07:37:49PM +0200
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 07:37:49PM +0200, Alain Frisch wrote:
> there seems to be a consensus that the Str library should be replaced with
> Pcre in the standard distribution. I guess that nobody is satisfied with
> Str, and that it is kept in the distribution for backward compatibility.
I'd prefer that both str and pcre are included, for backward compatibility.
> I don't want to speak for the Caml team, but I'm not sure to see how a 3rd
> party library could be included in the standard distribution. The OCaml
> distribution follows OCaml releases (of course !), and the author of the
> library may want to release more often. Recall that OCaml development does
> not follow the bazar model (?); including 3rd party packages is not the
> best way to keep control of the development of the language.
I agree that third party libraries are problematic, and I think it's wise to
keep their number to a minimum. In the specific case of pcre, I don't think it
would be too difficult to just include it and update it occasionally as
necessary. I think Python did this and it didn't cause too much grief.
> I think it is best to keep the OCaml distribution as small as possible,
> and to facilitate the installation of other packages.
I agree, but I also think a good regex package is essential and should be
standard. OCaml seems to be gaining momentum and I think a good, standard regex
package could be a significant boost. The PLEAC project is a good example of
the importance of such a package. I'd like to help with the perl -> ocaml
translations, but I think it would be a waste of time to write code using the
str module and I'm also hesitant to use a third party library in "cookbook"
examples.
Speaking just as an OCaml user, I'm much more concerned with the interface of
the package than the implementation. Perhaps there could be a "re" module, for
example, implemented now with pcre and later in pure OCaml?
--
miles
"We in the past evade X, where X is something which we believe to be a
lion, through the act of running." - swiftrain@geocities.com
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-23 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-23 17:37 Alain Frisch
2001-08-23 18:05 ` Miles Egan [this message]
2001-08-23 18:07 ` Markus Mottl
2001-08-24 15:33 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2001-08-23 18:32 Krishnaswami, Neel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010823110525.A5828@caddr.com \
--to=miles@caddr.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=frisch@clipper.ens.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox