From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA08280; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:33:21 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA08276 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:33:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from beaune.inria.fr (beaune.inria.fr [128.93.8.3]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f6PIXJH27570 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:33:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by beaune.inria.fr (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/14Sep99-0328PM) id UAA0000015674; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:33:19 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:33:19 +0200 (MET DST) From: Damien Doligez Message-Id: <200107251833.UAA0000015674@beaune.inria.fr> To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Strange Behaviour with Hashtables and Marshalling Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >From: Amit Dubey > (1) If I'm doing some processing, then I save a few relevant data >structures to disk with Marshal, terminate, then restart, reload >the data and then continue processing, I use significantly less memory than >if I process everything without stopping. I'd imagine with garbage >collection, this wouldn't be a problem, It looks like you have a fragmentation problem. Try Gc.compact (). -- Damien ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr