From: Markus Mottl <markus@mail4.ai.univie.ac.at>
To: OCAML <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] illegal permutation of structure fields?
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:04:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010723150428.B12189@chopin.ai.univie.ac.at> (raw)
Hello,
I've just found out to my surprise that the following does not work:
file: bla.ml
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
module type FOO = sig
val x : int
val y : int
end
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
file: bla.mli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
module type FOO = sig
val y : int
val x : int
end
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This yields the following error:
The implementation bla.ml does not match the interface bla.cmi:
Module type declarations do not match:
module type FOO = sig val x : int val y : int end
is not included in
module type FOO = sig val y : int val x : int end
Illegal permutation of structure fields
Why is this illegal? Wouldn't it be very straightforward to normalize
the signatures (e.g. sort elements by name) before matching them?
I knew that there is a somewhat similar restriction for record types,
which does not allow permutation of record elements in the type
definitions of implementation and interface.
In the latter case I see that without normalization there would be
problems correctly accessing record elements, but I don't quite understand
the rationale behind the first restriction.
Wouldn't normalization get rid of the problems in both cases? Or am I
overlooking anything?
Regards,
Markus Mottl
--
Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next reply other threads:[~2001-07-23 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-23 13:04 Markus Mottl [this message]
2001-07-23 15:27 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-07-23 16:07 ` Andreas Rossberg
2001-07-26 7:14 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-07-26 8:42 ` Markus Mottl
2001-07-23 16:36 ` Markus Mottl
2001-07-25 22:27 ` John Max Skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010723150428.B12189@chopin.ai.univie.ac.at \
--to=markus@mail4.ai.univie.ac.at \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox