From: Markus Mottl <markus@mail4.ai.univie.ac.at>
To: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] indent 2
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 13:20:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010722132010.A24487@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107221006.MAA17045@pauillac.inria.fr>; from Pierre.Weis@inria.fr on Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 12:06:05 +0200
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Pierre Weis wrote:
> Personnaly, I use one space with some exceptions for 2 spaces
> indentation (which is inconsistent, I know it!) for reasons that are
> explained in the Caml programming guidelines. (In short, I write
> 2 spaces to align the |'s in the pattern matchings of function
> definitions:
Always eager to improve the syntactic beauty of my sources, I wondered
how this indentation style looks like so I peeked at the implementation
of the Format-module, which seems to be written by you.
Indeed, this style is obviously very coherent: one can find anything
from 1, 2 to 4 spaces of indentation consistently applied throughout
the whole file, e.g.:
let add_queue x q =
let c = Cons {head = x; tail = Nil} in
...
let pp_print_as state n s =
if state.pp_curr_depth < state.pp_max_boxes
...
let pp_print_newline state () =
pp_flush_queue state true; state.pp_flush_function ()
...
The rules can be easily inferred: one space if the function body starts
with a "let", two if it starts with "if" and four in any other case.
Is it this kind of consistency you mean in the Programming Guidelines? :-)
Best regards,
Markus Mottl
P.S.: Sorry for my sarcasm! As usual I couldn't resist... ;)
--
Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-22 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-21 11:29 Damien Doligez
2001-07-21 16:45 ` Alexander V. Voinov
2001-07-21 18:07 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-07-22 10:06 ` Pierre Weis
2001-07-22 11:20 ` Markus Mottl [this message]
2001-07-23 0:27 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-07-23 7:52 ` Luc Maranget
2001-07-23 10:20 ` Markus Mottl
2001-07-22 19:40 ` Jeremy Fincher
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-21 4:50 [Caml-list] Dequeues (was Generation of streams is slow) Brian Rogoff
2001-07-21 5:03 ` [Caml-list] indent 2 Alexander V. Voinov
2001-07-21 11:09 ` Pierre Weis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010722132010.A24487@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at \
--to=markus@mail4.ai.univie.ac.at \
--cc=Pierre.Weis@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox