From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA11974; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:39:55 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA11894 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:39:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5S8dsr13733; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:39:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA08274; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:39:53 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:39:53 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: Florian Hars Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Where does Ocaml spend all the time? Message-ID: <20010628103953.D3129@verdot.inria.fr> References: <20010628101635.A25747@hars> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us In-Reply-To: <20010628101635.A25747@hars>; from florian@hars.de on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:16:35AM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:16:35AM +0200, Florian Hars wrote: > I have written an ocaml program, which is about an order of magnitude > slower than a similar C program, and now I am wondering what to do. Of course you compiled by ocamlopt, not ocamlc...? -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr