Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Hars <florian@hars.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Where does Ocaml spend all the time?
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:16:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010628101635.A25747@hars> (raw)

I have written an ocaml program, which is about an order of magnitude
slower than a similar C program, and now I am wondering what to do.
According to gprof, I have neiter written nor called most of the
top-scoring functions in my program:

  %   cumulative   self              self     total           
 time   seconds   seconds    calls  ms/call  ms/call  name    
  9.82      2.76     2.76  9822122     0.00     0.00  Verzeichnis_code_end
  9.00      5.29     2.53     3275     0.77     0.77  mark_slice
  8.15      7.58     2.29    17860     0.13     0.54  Stra$dfen_e_i_l_rec_129
  8.04      9.84     2.26 23232718     0.00     0.00  string_equal
  7.44     11.93     2.09     4088     0.51     0.62  sweep_slice
  5.73     13.54     1.61   390646     0.00     0.01  oldify
  4.16     14.71     1.17 22241546     0.00     0.00  Eintrag_code_begin
  3.88     15.80     1.09                             Stringhilfsfunktionen_code_begin

Only the third and fourth entry seem to do anything "useful", the rest
looks like administrative overhead to me. What are these functions
doing?
Are there any general hints on how to write ocaml programs for efficiency?
Like, don't use functional updates for records to reduce garbage?

Yours, Florian.
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


             reply	other threads:[~2001-06-28  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-28  8:16 Florian Hars [this message]
2001-06-28  8:34 ` Sven LUTHER
2001-06-28  8:37 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-06-28 10:02   ` Florian Hars
2001-07-02 13:16     ` Xavier Leroy
2001-07-02 16:21       ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-28  8:39 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-06-28 10:02   ` Florian Hars
2001-06-28  8:50 ` Remi VANICAT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010628101635.A25747@hars \
    --to=florian@hars.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox