From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: "Charles 'Buck' Krasic" <krasic@acm.org>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] interfacing C threads with OCaml
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:55:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010612165553.B3463@pauillac.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200106052004.f55K41r27032@hamilton.cse.ogi.edu>; from krasic@acm.org on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 01:04:01PM -0700
> It all works fine for a single pipeline, but I would like to support
> concurrent pipelines where each pipeline is implemented by a separate
> system thread (Linux pthreads).
>
> My OCaml pipeline function does a segmentation fault when I do this.
> I have built the OCaml code using the -thread flag, and my link step
> does -lthreadsnat. I understand that the OCaml runtime is not
> thread-safe, but I got the impression is that using -thread causes it
> to use a single master lock, which is released when calling out to C
> code; making it safe to mix threaded-C with OCaml.
This is almost correct: the master lock is not automatically released
when calling C code, because for short-running C functions this would
be too slow. Instead, the C function can choose to relinquish and
reacquire the master mutex using enter_blocking_section() and
leave_blocking_section(), e.g.
value C_function_called_from_Caml(...) {
/* Convert parameters from Caml to C */
enter_blocking_section();
/* Long-running C code that doesn't interact with the Caml runtime */
leave_blocking_section();
/* Convert results from C to Caml and return */
}
I assume your pipeline uses callbacks from C to Caml. If this is
correct, you also need to reacquire the master mutex before entering Caml
(using leave_blocking_section()) and release it after the Caml
callback has returned (using enter_blocking_section()), e.g.
leave_blocking_section();
/* Convert parameters from C to Caml */
res = callback(closure, argument);
/* Convert results from Caml to C */
enter_blocking_section();
> Are the marshalling macros in Chapter 17 (Store_field, etc.) safe wrt
> the OCaml master lock?
They are safe (just like the whole run-time system) as long as the
master lock is held, i.e. you're not between an enter_blocking_section()
and a leave_blocking_section().
Hope this helps,
- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-12 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-05 20:04 Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2001-06-12 14:55 ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010612165553.B3463@pauillac.inria.fr \
--to=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=krasic@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox