* [Caml-list] A new lexical oddity?
@ 2001-05-09 12:54 Christian RINDERKNECHT
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Christian RINDERKNECHT @ 2001-05-09 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Dear list,
I found this:
Objective Caml version 3.01
# module type S = sig val f : [< `A of <m : unit -> unit; ..>] -> unit end;;
Characters 58-60:
Syntax error: 'end' expected
Characters 16-19:
This 'sig' might be unmatched
# module type S = sig val f : [< `A of <m : unit -> unit; ..> ] -> unit end;;
module type S = sig val f : [< `A of < m : unit -> unit; .. >] -> unit end
#
I did know some "extra-space peculiarities" but this one is new to me.
Is it due to a mismatch with stream-pattern lexing? Is there a list of
such oddities? (Long time ago I heard that some inferred interfaces
are not regular signatures (for syntactical reasons), but it is a
different problem here.)
Best regards,
--
Christian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christian Rinderknecht Phone +33 (0)1 60 76 44 43
Institut National des Télécommunications Fax +33 (0)1 60 76 47 11
Département Logiciels Réseaux (LOR) WWW
9, Rue Charles Fourier, F-91011 Évry Cedex
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-05-13 20:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-09 12:54 [Caml-list] A new lexical oddity? Christian RINDERKNECHT
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox