From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA05365; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:30:34 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA05411 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:30:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f2R6UWn12301 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:30:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA19040 for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:30:33 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:30:33 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml Development Kit Message-ID: <20010327083033.D17997@verdot.inria.fr> References: <15039.15898.748515.834915@cremant.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us In-Reply-To: ; from patrick@watson.org on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:12:42PM -0500 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:12:42PM -0500, Patrick M Doane wrote: > 2) Use the stream parsers. I hesitate to use them because of their > status as "experimental" and that be removed at any time. I also have > heard claims that their performance is not too good compared with other > techniques. Does anyone know if this true? For optimal speed and tail recursion, code holding streams or streams parsers have to be preprocessed by Camlp4. Do: ocamlc -pp camlp4o foo.ml instead of: ocamlc foo.ml It can make a big difference. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr