From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] create a closure in external C function?
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 18:01:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010306180128.B12522@pauillac.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010306011427.03669de0@shell16.ba.best.com>; from checker@d6.com on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 01:29:57AM -0800
> I want to create a function and return it from an external C function:
>
> type ii = int -> int
> val f : int -> ii = "c_function"
>
> where c_function looks something like this:
>
> value c_function( value i )
> {
> return Val_closure(&some_c_int_int_function);
> }
>
> Is this possible?
Not directly, at least. Building closures from C isn't impossible,
just very delicate and highly processor-dependent (in the case of the
native-code compiler).
> So, if you wanted to make this work you'd have to return a pointer
> to a caml function that calls _caml_c_call, which isn't really
> documented either (and looks platform specific, although it seems to
> just be jumping to the address of the passed C function after
> setting things up).
Right. caml_c_call does part of the job, but is indeed very
platform-specific.
If the C functions you're interested in all have the same type,
say "int" to "int", there is an easy solution: instead of returning
them to Caml as Caml functions, return them as values of an abstract
type, and provide a separate "invoke" primitive:
(* Caml code *)
type ii
external ii_invoke: ii -> int -> int = "ii_invoke"
external c_function: ... -> ii = "c_function"
(* C code *)
value c_function(...)
{
return (value) &some_c_int_int_function;
}
value ii_invoke(value c_function, value arg)
{
return Val_int(((int (*)(int)) c_function)(Int_val(arg)));
}
Then, on the Caml side, you can always partially apply ii_invoke to a
value of type ii to get back the int->int Caml function you're looking
for.
This solution easily extends to the case of a finite number of C
function types, known in advance. As Fabrice noted, the hard part is
to deal with arbitrary many C function types, determined dynamically.
There, you'd need some kind of dynamic invocation interface for C
functions, and I don't know of any C library that provides this in a
portable or semi-portable fashion. (The closest thing that comes to
my mind is run-time code generators such as `C or Dyn-C.)
Hope this helps,
- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-06 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-06 9:29 Chris Hecker
2001-03-06 10:50 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2001-03-06 17:01 ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
2001-03-06 18:19 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-07 3:23 ` Fergus Henderson
2001-03-06 18:58 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-03-06 19:13 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-06 21:16 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-03-06 22:56 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-07 0:22 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-03-07 0:44 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-07 8:49 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010306180128.B12522@pauillac.inria.fr \
--to=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=checker@d6.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox