* [Caml-list] Accessing the nth element in a stream takes time quadratic in n
@ 2001-03-05 22:50 DURAK Berke
2001-03-06 5:46 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: DURAK Berke @ 2001-03-05 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
This happens when streams are defined recursively, as in
let rec nat_stream n = [< 'n; nat_stream (n + 1) >]
and the problem holds for streams built of channels or strings, too.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Accessing the nth element in a stream takes time quadratic in n
2001-03-05 22:50 [Caml-list] Accessing the nth element in a stream takes time quadratic in n DURAK Berke
@ 2001-03-06 5:46 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-03-06 7:46 ` kahl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel de Rauglaudre @ 2001-03-06 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: DURAK Berke; +Cc: caml-list
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:50:55PM +0100, DURAK Berke wrote:
> This happens when streams are defined recursively, as in
>
> let rec nat_stream n = [< 'n; nat_stream (n + 1) >]
>
> and the problem holds for streams built of channels or strings, too.
Preprocess by camlp4o (add "-pp camlp4o" among the options of ocamlc or
ocamlopt). The streams and stream parsers in OCaml parser are not
optimized.
--
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Accessing the nth element in a stream takes time quadratic in n
2001-03-06 5:46 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
@ 2001-03-06 7:46 ` kahl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kahl @ 2001-03-06 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr> wrote:
> The streams and stream parsers in OCaml parser are not optimized.
I am surprised!
So that's why they allow you only
to go faster than nsgmls (C++),
but not faster than sgmls (C)! ;-)
(I must admit that I usually have ``-inline 25'',
and that the .o/.ml length ratio is unusually high
for the stream parser module.
The experimemnt was, in addition, with a not fully validating parser,
and without part of the entity replacement complexities of SGML.
)
So I still am inclined to consider stream parsers as a fast
and useful alternative.
(But then I haven't tried to define streams recursively...)
The ocamllex/ocamlyacc implemented XML parser ``tony''
posted here quite a while ago could not compare, neither speed-wise,
nor in the size of files it could digest.
(I have never seen an update announcement of tony --- maybe I missed it.)
Wolfram Kahl
kahl@ist.unibw-muenchen.de
http://ist.unibw-muenchen.de/kahl/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-03-07 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-03-05 22:50 [Caml-list] Accessing the nth element in a stream takes time quadratic in n DURAK Berke
2001-03-06 5:46 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-03-06 7:46 ` kahl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox