From: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>
To: Markus Mottl <mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: R: Consortium Caml
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:23:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010211202300.L5787@verdot.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010211193649.A6572@miss.wu-wien.ac.at>; from mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0100
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0100, Markus Mottl wrote:
> I *do* think that OCaml very badly needs additional resources to give it
> the final touch to "conquer the world", but from a business point of view,
> I am in doubt that the scheme as proposed stands a high chance of success.
Ok. I see your long long message. You seem to know very well how the
market work. (this is not ironic, just a constatation.)
What do you propose? A bigger fee? Other thing than a Consortium?
Think more about it before deciding something else?
--
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-12 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-05 22:55 Alex Baretta
2001-02-07 19:30 ` Michel Mauny
2001-02-08 7:27 ` Sven
2001-02-08 15:59 ` Michel Mauny
2001-02-08 10:01 ` Sven
2001-02-08 17:18 ` Michel Mauny
2001-02-08 0:45 ` R: " Markus Mottl
2001-02-09 14:45 ` Fabien Fleutot
2001-02-09 16:22 ` Markus Mottl
2001-02-10 15:33 ` Jan Skibinski
2001-02-10 19:56 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-02-11 12:05 ` Markus Mottl
2001-02-11 14:49 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-02-11 18:36 ` Markus Mottl
2001-02-11 19:23 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre [this message]
2001-02-12 0:32 ` Markus Mottl
2001-02-11 15:26 ` John Max Skaller
2001-02-12 1:44 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-02-12 8:36 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-02-13 11:02 ` Frank Atanassow
2001-02-12 9:37 ` Jean-Marc Alliot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010211202300.L5787@verdot.inria.fr \
--to=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox