From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA22479 for caml-red; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:32:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA31061 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:39:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: from ip208.usw4.rb1.pdx.nwlink.com (ip208.usw4.rb1.pdx.nwlink.com [209.20.133.208])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with SMTP id f16MdNL24398
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:39:23 +0100 (MET)
Received: (qmail 18592 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2001 22:39:21 -0000
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:39:21 -0800
From: leary@nwlink.com
To: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>
Cc: Stephan Tolksdorf <andorxor@gmx.de>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Unbound type constructor
Message-ID: <20010206143921.A18400@jean>
References: <16911685873.20010205195844@gmx.de> <200102061635.RAA06784@pauillac.inria.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200102061635.RAA06784@pauillac.inria.fr>; from Pierre.Weis@inria.fr on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:35:02PM +0100
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

If the list management is/can be centralized, why not have 2 or 3 people doing the moderation?  

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:35:02PM +0100, Pierre Weis wrote:
> If this treatment of the list is considered harmful and not
> desirable, we can turn the list into some other mode, maybe a
> completely free (non-moderated) mode ...
>