From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA26565 for caml-red; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:28:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA02965 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:34:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.6.1]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id eARBY2918577 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:34:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from lambda.u-strasbg.fr (lambda.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.90.63]) by dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA05470; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:33:03 +0100 Received: from luther by lambda.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 140Mfi-0002OD-00; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:42:10 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:42:10 +0100 To: Markus Mottl Cc: Sven LUTHER , OCAML Subject: Re: libplot for OCaml? Message-ID: <20001127124210.A9184@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> References: <20001125114256.A23216@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> <20001127095629.A2413@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> <20001127115716.A24043@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001127115716.A24043@miss.wu-wien.ac.at>; from mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at on Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:57:16AM +0100 From: Sven LUTHER Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:57:16AM +0100, Markus Mottl wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > I have been working on c2caml, which should become an automatic or > > semi-automatic bindings generator from a C header file. > > Sounds like a very useful tool! If I am not mistaken, there have been other > efforts, too. Does anybody know what happened to them? Has anybody already > tried SWIG or similar? > > > If anybody is interrested in working on it, i could try to setup a > > public cvs repository of it, or even have it hosted at sourceforge ? > > It is probably less effort and gives the OCaml-community more visibility if > we put projects on SourceForge - I'll also do this in the near future. > Furthermore, if the initial author does not have time to maintain them > anymore, others can take over more easily: the hurdle of joining or taking > over a SourceForge project is much lower than for e.g. public cvs only. Ok, i just registered it at sourceforge, it will need 24hours or so for it to take place, but after that, it should be available at : http://c2caml.sourceforge.net Friendly, Sven Luther