From: eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp
To: Pierre.Weis@inria.fr
Cc: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr, sumii@saul.cis.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: WWW Page of Team PLClub (Re: ICFP programming contest: results)
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 12:21:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001007122103K.sumii@saul.cis.upenn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200010070759.JAA00538@pauillac.inria.fr>
> > (It was Jerome who decided that, but anyway...) The reason was
> > convenience: we could write matrix/vector multiplication by using
> > for-loops, for instance. As for the efficiency,
> > "records > tuples = arrays (without boundary checks)" and as for the
> > safety, "records = tuples > arrays", I suppose.
Oh, sorry, I meant "to represent matrices and vectors" only.
> Not exactly, for efficiency:
>
> records = tuples = array without boundary checks
Excuse me, but I'm a bit confused here... What did Xavier mean in the
message below then?
| Subject: Re: ICFP programming contest: results
| From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
| Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:55:21 +0200
|
| > Could you also tell us to what extent the knowledge of the
| > implementation of Ocaml was needed in order to get good performance ?
|
| The only important thing to know was that a record with three float
| fields is more efficient than a triple of floats.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-08 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-21 7:12 ICFP programming contest: results Xavier Leroy
2000-09-21 16:04 ` Brock
2000-09-24 3:36 ` Eijiro Sumii
2000-09-25 9:07 ` Jean-Francois Monin
2000-09-26 8:55 ` Xavier Leroy
2000-10-04 18:40 ` WWW Page of Team PLClub (Re: ICFP programming contest: results) eijiro_sumii
2000-10-05 21:19 ` malc
2000-10-06 9:46 ` Julian Assange
2000-10-06 19:10 ` eijiro_sumii
2000-10-06 20:13 ` eijiro_sumii
2000-10-06 20:05 ` eijiro_sumii
[not found] ` <200010070759.JAA00538@pauillac.inria.fr>
2000-10-07 16:21 ` eijiro_sumii [this message]
2000-10-08 21:06 ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-05 10:33 David McClain
2000-10-05 20:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2000-10-06 19:26 ` eijiro_sumii
2000-10-06 8:07 ` Xavier Leroy
2000-10-07 8:35 ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-07 9:55 ` Markus Mottl
2000-10-07 10:24 ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-08 21:26 ` John Max Skaller
2000-10-10 10:23 ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-09 5:51 ` Benjamin Pierce
2000-10-05 22:46 David McClain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001007122103K.sumii@saul.cis.upenn.edu \
--to=eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp \
--cc=Pierre.Weis@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr \
--cc=sumii@saul.cis.upenn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox