From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA18763 for caml-red; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:17:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA11070 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:50:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (labrador.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.247]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e93LoNr03422 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:50:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from nr@localhost) by labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA26734 for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:50:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:50:09 -0400 From: Norman Ramsey Message-Id: <200010032150.RAA26734@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu> To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: ratio of heap size to live data in Caml GC? Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Can anybody tell me what ratio of heap size to live data the OCaml collector needs to perform well? The default ratio appears to be 2.4. I assume this means the collector is a mark-and-sweep collector? Norman