From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA03630 for caml-red; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 23:00:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA32283 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:47:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e8EGlqr18799;
	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:47:52 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA02540; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:47:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <20000914184751.52791@pauillac.inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:47:51 +0200
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: miles <miles@caddr.com>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: commercializing ocaml
References: <20000906203118.A35936@bubo.inside>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1
In-Reply-To: <20000906203118.A35936@bubo.inside>; from miles on Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 08:31:18PM +0000
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

> I've been eagerly following the success of Bluetail and Erlang and
> wondering if something similar might be possible with OCaml.  The
> model seems simple: assemble a small team of first-class programmers
> and take advantage of the productivty gains afforded by a good
> functional language to compete on quality, performance, and time to
> market.

I did not reply immediately to your message, because I hoped members
of this list with more experience in start-up companies would comment.

The main issue, in my opinion, is to have a suitable application area
to target.  You simply can't sell a new language alone, even with a
good implementation.  Several companies were created in the '80s and
'90s to sell functional or logic languages and implementations, and I
think all of them went down.

The remarkable success of Bluetail is mainly due to them being experts
in a hot domain (telecom software).  The additional productivity and
reliability brought by Erlang over more conventional languages helped
them a lot, of course, but Erlang by itself would not have allowed
them to make such a big hit.

> For example, I see potential opportunities in the emerging
> ASP/hosted application market, where most interfaces are simple
> network text or XML protocols and fpl's advantages in dealing with
> complex logic could be critical.

That's one possibility -- although you should not disclose your
business plans on a mailing list :-)

> Has anyone considered such a venture?  Perhaps the folks at INRIA?

We didn't, really, by lack of a hot application area.

- Xavier Leroy