From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA15247 for caml-red; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:12:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA14670 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:06:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ropas.kaist.ac.kr (ropas.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.92.105]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e7B76Rj23303 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:06:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from kwang@localhost) by ropas.kaist.ac.kr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA00860; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:05:49 +0900 (KST) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:05:49 +0900 (KST) Message-Id: <200008110705.QAA00860@ropas.kaist.ac.kr> X-Authentication-Warning: ropas.kaist.ac.kr: kwang set sender to kwang@ropas.kaist.ac.kr using -f From: Kwangkeun Yi To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: exceptions in CamlLight 0.7 and OCaml Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Hi there, I have a quick question. Does OCaml have the same implementation for exceptions as in CamlLight 0.7? We want to test our source-level transformation of Standard ML programs in both SML/NJ and OCaml. But because what we want to measure is only about exceptions, if CamlLight implementation of exceptions is the same as in OCaml we can use the Moscow ML without having to translate our SML benchmarks into Caml. -Kwang -- Kwangkeun Yi http://cs.kaist.ac.kr/~kwang