From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA10964 for caml-red; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 19:55:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA20949 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 19:35:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from racine.cybercable.fr (racine.cybercable.fr [212.198.0.201])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id e73HZ7H00792
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 19:35:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (qmail 8136525 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2000 17:35:06 -0000
Received: from r113m168.cybercable.tm.fr (HELO alan-schm1p) ([195.132.113.168]) (envelope-sender <alan.schmitt@inria.fr>)
          by racine.cybercable.fr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <caml-list@inria.fr>; 3 Aug 2000 17:35:06 -0000
Received: by alan-schm1p (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 3 Aug 2000 17:35:35 +0200
From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 17:35:35 +0200
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: ocaml draws with C in trivial benchmark
Message-ID: <20000803173535.A2936@alan-schm1p.cybercable.fr>
Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <wxhf938cdy.fsf@suburbia.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <wxhf938cdy.fsf@suburbia.net>; from proff@iq.org on Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:35:37AM +1000
Organization: INRIA Rocquencourt 
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr


Is it me, or is there something weird in this data:

>                                     Total Run Time Percentage (slowest
>                                                    taken as 100%)
>         Ocaml, native compiler      4.803          0.91%
>         C solution (egcs)           4.855          0.9%

It takes less time, yet it's slower ...

Alan Schmitt

--
The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.