From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA19633 for caml-red; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:20:05 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA17747 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:52:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e6S9qHL17153;
	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:52:17 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA17790; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:52:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <20000728115216.13749@pauillac.inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:52:16 +0200
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: Norman Ramsey <nr@eecs.harvard.edu>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: overhead of GC in caml runtime?
References: <200007252147.RAA12650@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1
In-Reply-To: <200007252147.RAA12650@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu>; from Norman Ramsey on Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:47:48PM -0400
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

> Can anyone tell me approximately what fraction of time is
> spent in garbage collection, or even better, combined allocation and
> collection, in typical caml programs?

It depends how allocation-intensive your program is.  For instance, the
Knuth-Bendix benchmark (which allocates quite a lot of short-lived
data) spends about 20% of its time in GC and allocation in the major
heap, when compiled with ocamlopt on a Pentium.

The percentage is lower for bytecode programs, because the collector
still runs at the same speed while the mutator runs more slowly
because of the interpretation overhead.

Most allocations in the minor heap are expanded in-line, so they can't
be measured.

Hope this helps,

- Xavier Leroy